[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted mpich 1.2.1-17 (i386 all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 18:47:08 +0900
Source: mpich
Binary: mpich mpi-doc mpe-source
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.2.1-17
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@debian.org>
Description: 
 mpe-source - Source for MPE, for other package to build-depend
 mpi-doc    - Documentation for the MPICH implementation of MPI
 mpich      - Parallel computing system
Closes: 144075
Changes: 
 mpich (1.2.1-17) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * debian/rules: fixed symlink for man{1,2,4} in /usr/lib/mpich/man,
   thanks Gordon Sadler for noticing this. (closes: #144075)
   * remove reference to dh_suidregister in debian/rules.
Files: 
 9fa4aa20252ae53947b5de876daff0a7 680 devel extra mpich_1.2.1-17.dsc
 d8b1d03f92cff6b1fc30adb85c265f23 15052 devel extra mpich_1.2.1-17.diff.gz
 daba97d870b7b420f22744f9ab93c136 422312 doc optional mpi-doc_1.2.1-17_all.deb
 a29a8d105167cbe4654e0ea81c83c253 5863834 devel extra mpe-source_1.2.1-17_all.deb
 fbf1fe4b42dd6e4cc2ef421ab97aacc6 1160830 devel extra mpich_1.2.1-17_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: KUHASIKU WA http://www.gnupg.org/ WO GORANKUDASAI

iD8DBQE80ABEMFm/ks03VvQRApJGAKCV2lxnlWFDxiNiOv2PjtG/Ua7sZgCcCUUv
pojVUuDJqaHflY449t73/wc=
=+UER
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Accepted:
mpe-source_1.2.1-17_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mpich/mpe-source_1.2.1-17_all.deb
mpi-doc_1.2.1-17_all.deb
  to pool/main/m/mpich/mpi-doc_1.2.1-17_all.deb
mpich_1.2.1-17.diff.gz
  to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.1-17.diff.gz
mpich_1.2.1-17.dsc
  to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.1-17.dsc
mpich_1.2.1-17_i386.deb
  to pool/main/m/mpich/mpich_1.2.1-17_i386.deb


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: