[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gettext 0.10.40-3 (i386 source all)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  4 Feb 2002 17:44:42 +0100
Source: gettext
Binary: gettext-doc gettext-base gettext
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 0.10.40-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Changed-By: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Description: 
 gettext    - GNU Internationalization utilities
 gettext-base - GNU Internationalization utilities for the base system
 gettext-doc - Documentation for GNU gettext.
Changes: 
 gettext (0.10.40-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Modified prerm to be fault-tolerant regarding prerm scripts in
     previous gettext releases which did not depend on emacsen-common yet.
     This is possible because dpkg executes the new prerm if the old one fails.
     Should fix a bug which has been reported a lot of times.
Files: 
 7441661dc04335ae7ffbc2148772c9ac 715 devel optional gettext_0.10.40-3.dsc
 22cf8c569e69266b3efb62076f78bd74 12014 devel optional gettext_0.10.40-3.diff.gz
 a7067a8fc55a6223764ec2f4ee4f33df 116638 doc optional gettext-doc_0.10.40-3_all.deb
 e4e1ee0582d2f1326b37b9070065f548 199510 base standard gettext-base_0.10.40-3_i386.deb
 30d630fee1c26810172a6d30925a2c81 364726 devel optional gettext_0.10.40-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8XrvJd9Uuvj7yPNYRAmZ8AJ9sx8y97+VGmFxeRb+mh9MyhgjzMACggND2
bgdWA9sen5qn4BrpP089IjA=
=VbwO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
gettext-base_0.10.40-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext-base_0.10.40-3_i386.deb
gettext-doc_0.10.40-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext-doc_0.10.40-3_all.deb
gettext_0.10.40-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.10.40-3.diff.gz
gettext_0.10.40-3.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.10.40-3.dsc
gettext_0.10.40-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gettext/gettext_0.10.40-3_i386.deb



Reply to: