[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed iputils 20001110-6 (i386 source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  3 Jun 2001 14:21:35 -0400
Source: iputils
Binary: iputils-tracepath iputils-ping iputils-arping
Architecture: source i386
Version: 20001110-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
Changed-By: Noah Meyerhans <noahm@debian.org>
Description: 
 iputils-arping - Send ICMP echo requests to an ARP address
 iputils-ping - The ping utility from iputils
 iputils-tracepath - The tracepath utility from iputils
Closes: 99295
Changes: 
 iputils (20001110-6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Split arping out into its own separate package (iputils-arping)
   * Made iputils-arping conflict with arping, another package which
     provided the arping binary (Closes: Bug#99295)
   * Bumped the package standards version up to 3.5.4.0
Files: 
 39e3882c92993ba64f79e3c32e2667e7 651 net extra iputils_20001110-6.dsc
 8d2c9a822ee4c3b9738d410a4e44b71e 15827 net extra iputils_20001110-6.diff.gz
 895f11a210c9a5fe6eb7be01dcf8437f 37098 net extra iputils-ping_20001110-6_i386.deb
 0c21f2881a840feac3d0d40e9c139d24 26306 net extra iputils-tracepath_20001110-6_i386.deb
 de75269280a23162f3ca0b79b6e1f71b 15148 net extra iputils-arping_20001110-6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7Goa7YrVLjBFATsMRAo76AJ9G5gAYK+JWK8Rx7Qhoqjk/zimY/ACeNBmV
bZd7eVLnp/+q1PRPlmT/vrQ=
=8rQg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
iputils-tracepath_20001110-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-tracepath_20001110-6_i386.deb
iputils-ping_20001110-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-ping_20001110-6_i386.deb
iputils_20001110-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils_20001110-6.diff.gz
iputils-arping_20001110-6_i386.deb
  to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils-arping_20001110-6_i386.deb
iputils_20001110-6.dsc
  to pool/main/i/iputils/iputils_20001110-6.dsc



Reply to: