[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp 2.10-3 (all source)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun,  3 Jun 2001 01:56:05 -0600
Source: ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp
Binary: ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.10-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: high
Maintainer: Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>
Changed-By: Anthony Fok <foka@debian.org>
Description: 
 ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp - "AR PL Mingti2L Big5" Chinese TrueType font by Arphic Technology
Changes: 
 ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp (2.10-3) unstable; urgency=high
 .
   * Oops!  In my zeal to remove /etc/X11/fonts/TrueType/xfonts-arphic-*
     files from the obsolete xfonts-arphic-* packages, I forgot to check
     whether /etc/X11/fonts/TrueType exists before cd'ing into it
     in preinst, often causing install to fail.  (I feel like putting
     a brown paper bag over my head, again.  :-)  Thanks to fellow developer
     Ryuichi Arafune for reporting this bug.  Re: Bug#99685.
   * Added reminders in package description and in postinst to tell
     the user to install "x-ttcidfont-conf" to use the fonts in X.
     Thanks to ha shao for the reminder!  Re: Bug#98868.
Files: 
 c23714b261aecc6a480cfeec07bf1efa 646 x11 optional ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.dsc
 744560ffeaa0b7abdc009b3d476836a8 9142 x11 optional ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.diff.gz
 4359ae561ef4edf0fa0f9143015b5b1b 5602324 x11 optional ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE7GgEsLa8qZm1n95ARAivIAJ9A0LlkelrnIEi+CROA9A8wya7qvgCfQlKz
XbaObyY+kJnqpP9+ZeFkk6U=
=pqF7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Installed:
ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.dsc
  to pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.dsc
ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3_all.deb
ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp/ttf-arphic-bsmi00lp_2.10-3.diff.gz



Reply to: