[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed sdl-mixer1.0 1:1.0.7-1 (source i386)



Installed:
sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/libs/sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
  replacing sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.4.orig.tar.gz
libsdl-mixer-dev_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/devel/libsdl-mixer-dev_1.0.7-1.deb
  replacing libsdl-mixer-dev_1.0.4-1.deb
sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/libs/sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
  replacing sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.4-1.diff.gz
sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/libs/sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.dsc
  replacing sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.4-1.dsc
libsdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/libs/libsdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.deb
  replacing libsdl-mixer1.0_1.0.4-1.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  1 Dec 2000 00:10:48 +0100
Source: sdl-mixer1.0
Binary: libsdl-mixer1.0 libsdl-mixer-dev
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:1.0.7-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Christian T. Steigies <cts@debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian T. Steigies <cts@debian.org>
Description: 
 libsdl-mixer-dev - Development files for SDL mixer library
 libsdl-mixer1.0 - mixer library for Simple DirectMedia Layer
Changes: 
 sdl-mixer1.0 (1:1.0.7-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * new upstream version
Files: 
 744b81ba8985ab3a434d214d287199a8 680 libs optional sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.dsc
 93c8f3b3be5ea8735d99212ea73ba040 451629 libs optional sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7.orig.tar.gz
 4c40ce6549d3f4a9269c5694e3dfb69c 2604 libs optional sdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1.diff.gz
 be268871cfa075198005e5cc82530a8d 92988 libs optional libsdl-mixer1.0_1.0.7-1_i386.deb
 4cf46f99124518a970267c93824970ae 119292 libs optional libsdl-mixer-dev_1.0.7-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6Jt+JhWcuXd2lEoARAsbEAJwLNQwCJx93Qfzae5PU1MkIKKdJNACeOeYU
Ue/JbGkQiK++Ga1jTbOghOQ=
=B+xH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: