[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded blacs-mpi 1.1-10 (m68k) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.6
Date: Sat,  6 May 2000 07:35:28 +0200
Source: blacs-mpi
Binary: blacs1-lam blacs-mpich-dev blacs-test-common blacs-lam-dev blacs-mpich-test blacs-lam-test blacs1-mpich
Architecture: m68k
Version: 1.1-10
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/m68k Build Daemon <buildd@kullervo.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Description: 
 blacs-lam-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-lam-test - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-mpich-dev - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs-mpich-test - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs1-lam - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
 blacs1-mpich - Basic Linear Algebra Communications Subprograms
Closes: 62862 63466 63467 63468 63469 63470
Changes: 
 blacs-mpi (1.1-10) frozen unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Changed recommendation of blacs-lam-test from scalapack1-lam-test
     to scalapack-lam-test. Closes: #62862
   * Removed all recommendations and suggestions since I have problems
     with scalapack. Closes: #63466, #63467, #63468, #63469, #63470
Files: 
 87d86ce833b5d53fc201cc85a8a07ad5 40550 devel extra blacs1-lam_1.1-10_m68k.deb
 f1939c2ccc6c448f21bcfbcb6eec0529 44470 devel extra blacs-lam-dev_1.1-10_m68k.deb
 9e4a4c3381cd07d2ad08748391d955a2 717826 devel extra blacs-lam-test_1.1-10_m68k.deb
 b446138b99697541bc08d153ef9b7249 40028 devel extra blacs1-mpich_1.1-10_m68k.deb
 13cc653c5f45c89509376cbe7b29984b 44478 devel extra blacs-mpich-dev_1.1-10_m68k.deb
 7481387e9cea1f69357bdb6e02a97c8b 717856 devel extra blacs-mpich-test_1.1-10_m68k.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (SunOS)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>

iEYEARECAAYFAjkyKQEACgkQcS3JWD3FdvfTDQCfaSShoE9PIaa8yhrmzjaBjVwJ
pBoAn3/Fy8p/m/ITlnUHreYCbjtMlQ6j
=g35Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: