[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed dict-foldoc 20000421-1 (all source)



Installed:
dict-foldoc_20000421.orig.tar.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/text/dict-foldoc_20000421.orig.tar.gz
  replacing dict-foldoc_19991007.orig.tar.gz
dict-foldoc_20000421-1.diff.gz
  to dists/woody/main/source/text/dict-foldoc_20000421-1.diff.gz
  replacing dict-foldoc_19991007-1.diff.gz
dict-foldoc_20000421-1.dsc
  to dists/woody/main/source/text/dict-foldoc_20000421-1.dsc
  replacing dict-foldoc_19991007-1.dsc
dict-foldoc_20000421-1_all.deb
  to dists/woody/main/binary-all/text/dict-foldoc_20000421-1.deb
  replacing dict-foldoc_19991007-1.deb


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2000 15:48:09 -0400
Source: dict-foldoc
Binary: dict-foldoc
Architecture: source all
Version: 20000421-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Bob Hilliard <hilliard@debian.org>
Description: 
 dict-foldoc - FOLDOC Dictionary Database
Changes: 
 dict-foldoc (20000421-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New upstream version 20000421
     Created new dict-foldoc_20000421.orig.tar.gz
 .
   * Changed Description field in control file
 .
   * Updated version date in db target of Makefile.in
 .
   * Update to Standards version 3.1.1.1
 .
   * Cleaned up Makefile.in to remove references to other dictionaries
     (previously commented out).
Files: 
 faafcc39411ac6542ea2bf77fa5ede9a 647 text optional dict-foldoc_20000421-1.dsc
 0de63c74b33257005862bc2a201599c5 1987126 text optional dict-foldoc_20000421.orig.tar.gz
 2d110bf895f8bbde0091a353cb497a1b 5935 text optional dict-foldoc_20000421-1.diff.gz
 c81885bcffb7246b3839014fb7903686 2188858 text optional dict-foldoc_20000421-1_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBOQySMbjz28yo5A65AQEfOgP+NXqpNiSgXKEgU4qF+3UWOOERWismgslv
EHcEoL6JdHEv8dFRNGkWK9jr/MHhnlRMoeYRR8+M1Ah/5mqJDivKZ/tKrESZNaAD
2Mue1vtCsgJf0YDLkCJ5vcaJ/d/W5hIUc2Zka2ZEO8PRkIQDvoFjP4deq5Yhg3t3
n7cL0HVB3mc=
=RYI7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: