[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed nano 0.7.4-2 (source i386)



Installed:
nano_0.7.4-2.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/editors/nano_0.7.4-2.dsc
  replacing nano_0.7.4-1.dsc
nano_0.7.4-2_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/editors/nano_0.7.4-2.deb
  replacing nano_0.7.4-1.deb
nano_0.7.4-2.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/editors/nano_0.7.4-2.diff.gz
  replacing nano_0.7.4-1.diff.gz


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:21:12 +0100
Source: nano
Binary: nano
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.7.4-2
Distribution: frozen
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Fernando Sanchez <fer@debian.org>
Description: 
 nano       - free Pico clone with some new features
Closes: 57045
Changes: 
 nano (0.7.4-2) frozen; urgency=medium
 .
   * Applied a patch from the upstream maintainer which backports a
     bugfix from version 0.7.6 that which an error in the handling of 'tab'
     spacing. The editor is more or less useless without this fix if you
     are editing a file with tabs, as the cursor is missplaced in some
     columns. (Closes: #57045)
   * debian/README.Debian: Placed a comment to note that
     nano_0.7.4.orig.tar.gz is not a completely pristine source as it
     has been patched.
Files: 
 e74a78de6909024b4070ded0d4a01758 817 editors optional nano_0.7.4-2.dsc
 9ae4a0977d9d4ee82d56dca3baf378eb 8249 editors optional nano_0.7.4-2.diff.gz
 4656961230bcd49a3106d70e8f5cf4c0 26390 editors optional nano_0.7.4-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv

iQEVAwUBOJv2FEe61tg/7DnrAQFjjQgAuqnOcEn97ArhVj1noZVm7Yb9oHylFRA1
n9aL0bFAM94ZXpANwbcuNRZJrUB7VLMUHFbADb6mmeK64qus8zf4NzGaMVLwLpBQ
yPj7RzwVMLLtYXuAGq0TCVHnwzN8V8Fp/PB+3eQdvDsPSsh731va4nB24mau1NUR
XzextrjmnLFKf3TQysu/+dM9XXSBfUAMv9P+T9+V0QS2G739EKhWjv6UObOw/7GZ
xXuH2KL5y2XpvbRGxTS6Sj8F0Ry15B9hu7xcx2AmILbs8n5Sh2rutNagDTDKwU2T
FLdagV6Y+iSAVJ5E5GjNpv4vUOczYDXtHtWkLmqfK5wct+1dEk+mSQ==
=01Ae
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: