Installed netbase 3.16-9 (source i386)
Installed:
netbase_3.16-9_i386.deb
to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/base/netbase_3.16-9.deb
replacing netbase_3.16-8.deb
netbase_3.16-9_i386.deb
to dists/woody/main/binary-i386/base/netbase_3.16-9.deb
replacing netbase_3.16-8.deb
netbase_3.16-9.diff.gz
to dists/potato/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-9.diff.gz
replacing netbase_3.16-8.diff.gz
netbase_3.16-9.diff.gz
to dists/woody/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-9.diff.gz
replacing netbase_3.16-8.diff.gz
netbase_3.16-9.dsc
to dists/potato/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-9.dsc
replacing netbase_3.16-8.dsc
netbase_3.16-9.dsc
to dists/woody/main/source/base/netbase_3.16-9.dsc
replacing netbase_3.16-8.dsc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.6
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2000 01:14:14 +1000
Source: netbase
Binary: netbase
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.16-9
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Anthony Towns <ajt@debian.org>
Description:
netbase - Basic TCP/IP networking binaries
Closes: 56020 56910 56940
Changes:
netbase (3.16-9) frozen unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Make ifup/ifdown use dhclient/pump/dhcpcd/dhcpcd-sv for DHCP,
depending on kernel version and/or what's actually installed. This
is important for boot-floppies. (Closes: Bug#56020)
.
* Fix up -n option (which is missing from getopt(), tsk), and correct
the --help display. (Closes: Bug#56910)
.
* Remove the m68k-doesn't-have-glibc2 kludge, since it now does
have glibc2. (Closes: Bug#56940)
Files:
feb0fa2887437eb96025470b5ac82226 658 net standard netbase_3.16-9.dsc
64b43d2afa7a26799703a9ccccff7de7 97960 net standard netbase_3.16-9.diff.gz
f0c701eaab3cc737bddce985458f1b8a 497572 net standard netbase_3.16-9_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iQCVAwUBOJmgdeRRvX9xctrtAQEULAP+MZ/m9DWqXwOjdNU17ILCVY3R8/jneNQU
u+BQyWwlLe3oV/YJXLU5JWt95J6bfuVYVMEFZMDebli/l38vQyopRz2z0sE/NoJZ
QwNPftAcSdZ7Ldpgh9Z9X3RWwfb0N5NMT62YHhM/GTm9dueze9YnHk/aqzUZDAQW
VLhIwtMzdTs=
=zSV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: