[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Installed gdm 2.0-0.beta4.6 (source i386)



Installed:
gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6_i386.deb
  to dists/potato/main/binary-i386/x11/gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.deb
  replacing gdm_2.0-0.beta4.5.deb
gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.diff.gz
  to dists/potato/main/source/x11/gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.diff.gz
  replacing gdm_2.0-0.beta4.5.diff.gz
gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.dsc
  to dists/potato/main/source/x11/gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.dsc
  replacing gdm_2.0-0.beta4.5.dsc


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.6
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 23:50:43 -0800
Source: gdm
Binary: gdm
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.0-0.beta4.6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
Description: 
 gdm        - GNOME Display Manager
Closes: 51103 51846 52245 52321 52408 53065 53601
Changes: 
 gdm (2.0-0.beta4.6) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer.
   * Disable XDMCP by default (safer default)
   * Modified gdm.conf to start up as :1 on vt8 as a default
   * Updated to Standards-Version 3.1.1
   * Moved to FHS 2.1 draft (/var/state -> /var/lib)
   * Applied patch to solve (null) locale/session (Closes: #51846, #52321)
   * Added pam_env.so to /etc/pam.d/gdm (Closes: #52408)
   * Applied retry limit patch (Closes: #51103, #53065)
   * Recompiled with new libesd-dev (Closes: #52245)
   * Compiled with libwrap0
   * export MAIL environment variable in Gnome session script (Closes: #53601)
Files: 
 c0fb2e26761af67bde25f7cedf0a6c09 726 x11 optional gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.dsc
 15ff163e504409975ba26174813498f7 12742 x11 optional gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6.diff.gz
 ea3a2ae057e087962ebbfaff74bcb930 144340 x11 optional gdm_2.0-0.beta4.6_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iQCVAwUBOG4Ww9rM2c0MTKvxAQH1KAP+K+uTuLIwWS65OlrGluTjowizjax9s2br
2g/a2Ty2rALBA8ZxDwEy7QU2gE5AYSwCYzVbdrIGp1fjbr00kAD1S8rAENjWELq4
G8QKLh7NTUZ6xq22nC+37J4LOsNMH1U/u0L5V+o4foniigxRbmqNyaB73L0usrrv
rlpb+J8FPGc=
=DjTj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: