Re: indent 2.2.2-1 (source all i386) uploaded to erlangen

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Fri, 1 Oct 1999, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 01, 1999 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > Because /usr/share/doc without symlinks will be "illegal" sometime soon
> > (as soon as the policy editors modify policy according to the technical
> > commitee), while /usr/doc without /usr/share/doc will still be allowed for
> > some time.
> 
> Just out of curiosity: why didn't you just implement the symlink
> transition method?

It could be a waste of time. I still see a small chance that they will not
be required in the near future (read: if we decide to reduce the
transition period to just potato).

Anyway, the symlink method is not widely announced yet, and the switch to
FHS is not release-critical. When the symlink method was made policy and
widely announced, modifying debmake accordingly will be one of my
priorities.

Thanks.

-- 
 "d2479a9f0f9818b99a492cc4d4b8e65e" (a truly random sig)