[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded jade 1.2.1-7 (powerpc) to erlangen



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Mon,  3 May 1999 02:08:33 -0400
Source: jade
Binary: libsp1-dev libsp1 sp jade
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 1.2.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian/PowerPC Build Daemon <buildd@powerpc.debian.org>
Description: 
 jade       - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
 libsp1     - Runtime library for James Clark's SP suite
 libsp1-dev - James Clark's SP suite, developer support
 sp         - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
Changes: 
 jade (1.2.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * sp: new conffile, /etc/sp.catalog, which is initially populated with
     'OVERRIDE YES', which means that public (catalog) identifiers will
     override system identifiers, which is relevant to XML files which
     require both (as suggested by Gregor Hoffleit).  You can put other
     global settings relevant to sp here also.
   * correct libsp1 dependancy, discovered by the maintainer when upgrading
     a hamm system to slink
   * jade postinst: remove old policy violating sgml.catalog scrubbing; now
     that is provided in a little script which can be hand run,
     /usr/lib/jade/scrub-dsssl-catalog-cruft; be more discriminate in how
     many cases we run under
   * postinst: other minor style fixups
   * rebuilt with newest g++ and libstdc++ packages
Files: 
 ca4f7ece3ff7674d6b65aef166f53a95 138444 text optional sp_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_powerpc.deb
 9cfa25ad7e64622f8e95a8bc318f0610 1653062 text optional libsp1_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_powerpc.deb
 2343115508fa50830f79c5650711a696 1962760 text optional libsp1-dev_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_powerpc.deb
 23a23ad872f08a13eb5dbaaf3043c0eb 249886 text optional jade_1.2.1-7_powerpc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: noconv

iQB1AwUBNzGxdGlCJl9IkOrZAQH/wQMAgl30lA3YNmXiU4OHQKiIj2y2vrnGn9AH
qJXa8Fxqw2yTAIsNA2YyXGHsmwhMznCuOJzTI/cOVanVzw+Oq/lFoBLJlOgIxRXr
SkUVkYnexEC0FDtCzqTi6XpLO+Xo6hjg
=Daqo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: