[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Uploaded jade 1.2.1-7 (sparc) to master



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Format: 1.5
Date: Mon,  3 May 1999 02:08:33 -0400
Source: jade
Binary: libsp1-dev libsp1 sp jade
Architecture: sparc
Version: 1.2.1-7
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Adam Di Carlo <aph@debian.org>
Description: 
 jade       - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
 libsp1     - Runtime library for James Clark's SP suite
 libsp1-dev - James Clark's SP suite, developer support
 sp         - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
Changes: 
 jade (1.2.1-7) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * sp: new conffile, /etc/sp.catalog, which is initially populated with
     'OVERRIDE YES', which means that public (catalog) identifiers will
     override system identifiers, which is relevant to XML files which
     require both (as suggested by Gregor Hoffleit).  You can put other
     global settings relevant to sp here also.
   * correct libsp1 dependancy, discovered by the maintainer when upgrading
     a hamm system to slink
   * jade postinst: remove old policy violating sgml.catalog scrubbing; now
     that is provided in a little script which can be hand run,
     /usr/lib/jade/scrub-dsssl-catalog-cruft; be more discriminate in how
     many cases we run under
   * postinst: other minor style fixups
   * rebuilt with newest g++ and libstdc++ packages
Files: 
 f7812c4486998d4e82440d16d1208527 137094 text optional sp_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_sparc.deb
 8ec604051e0b851aaa9af9157b4b6725 1318440 text optional libsp1_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_sparc.deb
 7d921a49005ee9bb837b7a08e7a8c818 1579722 text optional libsp1-dev_1.3.3-1.2.1-7_sparc.deb
 d03400862da7ae89d7efe4dceb9dee78 243808 text optional jade_1.2.1-7_sparc.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBNzB/c4/8QF79WmfNAQGH8wP/X0QRwfbzr3pIntpEqsk6H5bVgV17NQIq
61ukQu0YXqfc3KbNdvfYmFh/1GgjjUqj2Q5ofUfGpi/O1hiCCEqgghsBpUHyRDLl
j9KE21mCqd8WGDOd5y2ZKX5G4gLt3A8ctMjYpCfCWbM7v4UvCp01LiH8xliCx/kJ
kYQw1VlVfHI=
=aXv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: