Uploaded jade 1.1-5 (alpha) to master
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Format: 1.5
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 16:47:44 -0500
Source: jade
Binary: sp-dev sp jade
Architecture: alpha
Version: 1.1-5
Distribution: frozen unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@debian.org>
Description:
jade - James Clark's DSSSL Engine
sp - James Clark's SGML parsing tools
sp-dev - James Clark's SGML parsing library, developer support
Changes:
jade (1.1-5) frozen unstable; urgency=low
.
* set SGML_SEARCH_PATH_DEFAULT to /usr/lib/sgml:/usr/local/lib/sgml (was
unset before, leading to wierd searching in /etc sometimes)
* set SGML_CATALOG_FILES_DEFAULT to
/usr/lib/sgml/catalog:/usr/local/lib/sgml/catalog
* rebuild with egcs-2.90.26 980308, remove -fno-implicit-templates,
which means Alpha platform should compile out of the box, linked
against libstdc++2.8 as well
* fixing dependancies: sp shouldn't depend on itself, sp-dev now
depends on sync'd version of sp, jade depends on sync'd version of sp;
I think tight coupling is there between jade and sp. I might loosen
it later.
* call ldconfig in sp's postinst, as stipulated by David Engel
* don't build SP tools with -fpic, you silly!
Files:
ed325a1bda3d3a802eb7e3f20175437b 1039640 text optional sp_1.3-1.1-5_alpha.deb
e8869efbca6d64f6764b0bd7a74762c9 1542330 text optional sp-dev_1.3-1.1-5_alpha.deb
bd66724eee2d6a3939ad6fbba8f5a4d9 790772 text optional jade_1.1-5_alpha.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNU0DMbs4mF/nmYXlAQFyewf+NdNyPOilxmDYLJaDbf/No1sBaELB2lRE
AlivydXtCc6w3oTdr8mgMMxnhwr1Bk6WqshJQXQ9qKiCeoBg160sjgn9iAH/rKYU
CFM7EPgSEiipRVLTIscIJwYUJcX/FjmmtPc6wudPzJzIL67osH7opE06hz8vR9z/
klhhJwJEV0nr97wjOl7J396K2V8VWRbEdysFl+NMLDrzircCN7TMYoTx3pp7CXp6
5dGFCzoxUkfL/kfO4h0K6nXI54RsJYy5koEFTrCF+TV52W30yP881L+p2Lv9siSI
9fDp/8OZ3JxmJy+TFzSXTWdeU5UimT5kpX4Cpk79ERT/2UIi97RtjQ==
=nDT6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-changes-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: