[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[CTTE #681687] Resolution of evince mime entry dispute



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

The question of evince's failure to supply a mime type entry for pdfs
was referred to the Technical Committee, after the release team
decided that it was a release critical bug.

The TC has made the following decision:

    1. The Technical Committee agrees with Neil McGovern's analysis of
       the situation regarding evince's missing mime type entry.

    2. If changes are desirable to our system for dealing with mime
       type entries and desktop files, including changes to policy or
       additional automation, these should be made via the usual
       development and policy amendment processes.

    3. We defer to the Release Team's decision that it is now too late
       to deploy such automation in wheezy.

    4. We do not disagree with the Release Team's assessment that
       the failure of the evince package to provide a mime type
       entry is a release critical bug.

    5. We therefore decline to overrule the Release Team.  The bug
       remains RC against evince.

    6. The release team should clarify which mime types the RC-bugginess
       applies to.  We recommend that the starting point should be those
       mime types advertised by evince via the mime system in squeeze.

Please see http://bugs.debian.org/681687 for background and
discussion, including the messages from Neil McGovern which are
referred to in the TC decision.

Ian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJQKoXcAAoJEOPjOSNItQ05vXAH/izkmGOer+SkgvZFLN36I+68
D65hrbu+OmAD76cDIGU/hR84t8WsKgcvz86WekUYuCi6nWf9wfjH6CUl4H0M2n1s
96nCfo1TZ3Nsb25tqeobaZUbapnjmE/5WdanGkI89hOKQWHvlHw3MvhQAzVCTdUs
1HsJicHAwL89DmjfgZGAssy2ki7v3CsIKq30o9wXOyDondHluNOhiFFpOYjdXt78
22TAsgoZdB6ctJbyl7wqTOrFeTSUmaB2htIsPW0TFkyku7T8taaYT1P0UipJvgLI
ifpeE7VNWsPIpqv0yJyWDdSkBGoRagK8ErW0hmzoqugYx2rsBMhPdHX7tL50wsU=
=IOth
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: