On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:29:43 +0200 Moritz Mühlenhoff <muehlenhoff@univention.de> wrote: > Hi Paul, > > > With the derivatives census, when I've detected a specific class of > > issue (such as missing apt sources.list snippets or lack of source > > packages), I have generally BCCed the affected derivatives and not > > sent the mail anywhere else. I was wondering if I should be also > > sending the mail to the debian-derivatives list. To get an idea of > > the frequency and topics, please refer to the list at the end of > > this email. > > I don't know how complicated it is to create additional pseudo > packages in the BTS , but if that's possible we could create > "derivative-$NAMEOFDERIVATE" pseudo packages in the Debian BTS. AT that point you're asking derivatives to work in the debian bts too. not a problem for upstreaming things, but its quite annoying to have multiple BTS locations for internal work. Examples of topics i'd consider 'internal' work: > Topic: potentially violating the GPL or LGPL > Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 > > Topic: modifying binary packages? > Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 thanks, kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature