[website/master] REJECT-FAQ: Fix typos
---
REJECT-FAQ.html | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/REJECT-FAQ.html b/REJECT-FAQ.html
index b6a3cea..62d475c 100644
--- a/REJECT-FAQ.html
+++ b/REJECT-FAQ.html
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; xml:lang="en" lang="en">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
- <meta name="description" content="Reject FAQ for Debians NEW Queue" />
+ <meta name="description" content="Reject FAQ for Debian's NEW Queue" />
<meta name="generator" content="GNU/Emacs" />
<title>Reject FAQ for Debian's NEW-Queue</title>
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
it doesn't make any sense to split a 50k arch:all package from a 250k
arch:any one. Or splitting a package for only one file, depending on
the main package. Yes, big dependency chains can be a reason. Or big
- documentation splitted into one -doc package. The point there is
+ documentation split into one -doc package. The point there is
<b>big</b>.</td>
<td> </td>
@@ -477,11 +477,11 @@
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Package uses <tt>waf</tt> as build system</td>
- <td>That's a special case of <q>source code missing</q>. Normaly
+ <td>That's a special case of <q>source code missing</q>. Normally
packages using waf as build system contain a Python script
with a compressed tarball embedded as a binary blob, where
it is not obvious how to get the actual source. As that's not
- considered to be the prefered form of modification, it fails
+ considered to be the preferred form of modification, it fails
the DFSG. See <a href="https://bugs.debian.org/645190";>#645190</a> and
<a href="https://wiki.debian.org/UnpackWaf";>https://wiki.debian.org/UnpackWaf</a>
for details.</td>
--
2.1.4
Reply to: