[website/master] Fixes some issues, thanks MJ Ray for the review

[Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>]

---
 REJECT-FAQ.html |   16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/REJECT-FAQ.html b/REJECT-FAQ.html
index 87ffb5e..8015f43 100644
--- a/REJECT-FAQ.html
+++ b/REJECT-FAQ.html
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@
   priority:</p>
 
   <ul>
-    <li>trying to keep the archive legal</li>
+    <li>trying to keep the archive legal;</li>
 
-    <li>trying to keep the package namespace sane</li>
+    <li>trying to keep the package namespace sane;</li>
 
-    <li>trying to reduce the number of bugs in Debian</li>
+    <li>trying to reduce the number of bugs in Debian.</li>
   </ul>
 
   <p class="text">Not all QA issues will be noticed; we don't test
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
   issue seems.</p>
 
   <p class="text">Of course this does not take away the developers'
-  responsibility to do their own QA before the upload. It's the maintainer
+  responsibility to do their own QA before uploading. It's the maintainer
   who is responsible for everything that happens with a bad package, not
   the FTP Team!</p>
 
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
   from time to time, as we may change points or add new ones.</p>
 
   <p class="text">Note: This is a purely informational list, there may be
-  more reasons. The third column it states the date when the entry was
+  more reasons. The third column states the date when the entry was
   added to this list.</p>
 
   <p class="text">If you want to make it easy for us, then please state
@@ -160,9 +160,9 @@
       thousands of files (think about X, KDE, Kernel or similar big
       packages), but most of the tarballs aren't that big. Also not-nice is
       a package, itself being GPL, having documentation licensed with a
-      non-free license, like some CC licenses: makes the original tarball
+      non-free license, like some CC licenses, makes the original tarball
       non-free. This is one of the cases where you need to repackage it
-      (look in the archive for examples, mostly having "dfsg" in their
+      (look in the archive for examples, mostly having <i>dfsg</i> in their
       tarballs' name).</td>
 
       <td>&nbsp;</td>
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
       <td>Renaming source for DFSG-removals</td>
       
       <td>Do not rename the source if you delete files that are not DFSG free.
-      Instead add a "dfsg" somewhere to the version part to mark it. Renaming the source
+      Instead add a <i>dfsg</i> somewhere to the version part to mark it. Renaming the source
       just confuses tools like the PTS, which are source-package based, and also confuses
       users, who can't simply fetch sources anymore without looking what source package
       it is first.
-- 
1.7.10.4