[website/master] Fix typos
Signed-off-by: Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz@debian.org>
---
REJECT-FAQ.html | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/REJECT-FAQ.html b/REJECT-FAQ.html
index addf49b..55bc213 100644
--- a/REJECT-FAQ.html
+++ b/REJECT-FAQ.html
@@ -57,14 +57,14 @@
<p class="text">Not all QA issues will be noticed; we don't test
packages, but we do look through them and note problems that jump out at
- us. Sometimes that'll result in a bug, sometimes it will result in an
+ us. Sometimes it will result in a bug, sometimes it will result in an
email, sometimes it will result in a REJECT, depending on how serious the
issue seems.</p>
<p class="text">Of course this does not take away the developers
- responsibility to do their own QA before upload. Its the maintainer who
+ responsibility to do their own QA before upload. It's the maintainer who
is responsible for everything that happens with a bad package, not the
- ftpteam!</p>
+ FTP Team!</p>
<p class="text">All items are things that <b>really</b> should never
happen anyway, but exist in some packages nonetheless. Visit this list
@@ -75,8 +75,8 @@
entry was added to this list.</p>
<p class="text">If you want to make it easy for us, then please state
- <b>why</b> you've added a NEW binary package or renamed source. A simple
- <i>New upstream</i> or <i>Fixed bug</i> isn't great.</p>
+ <b>why</b> you've added a NEW binary package or renamed a source package.
+ A simple <i>New upstream</i> or <i>Fixed bug</i> isn't great.</p>
<table border="0">
<tr>
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
<td>PHP License</td>
<td>You have a PHP add-on package (any php script/"app"/thing, not
- PHP itself) and its licensed only under the standard PHP license.
+ PHP itself) and it's licensed only under the standard PHP license.
That license, up to the 3.x which is actually out, is not really
usable for anything else than PHP itself.
<a href="http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/08/msg00128.html";>I've
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
thousands of files (think about X, KDE, Kernel or similar big
packages), but most of the tarballs aren't that big. Also not-nice is
a package, itself being GPL, having documentation licensed with a
- non-free license, like the CC licenses. Makes the original tarball
- non-free, this is one of the cases where you need to repackage it
+ non-free license, like some CC licenses, makes the original tarball
+ non-free. This is one of the cases where you need to repackage it
(look in the archive for examples, mostly having .dfsg. in their
tarballs name).</td>
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
<tr>
<td>Transition</td>
- <td>You <i>break</i> a transition. Like, in the past we had the
+ <td>You <i>break</i> a transition. In the past we had the
C++ one, but there might be any number of transitions running.
<!-- Well, right at the moment it's the -->
<!-- nice C++ ABI thing, but in the future it may be something else. For -->
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
<tr>
<td>Hijack</td>
- <td>You try to hijack a package of an active maintainer ( or team).
+ <td>You try to hijack a package of an active maintainer (or team).
Don't do that.</td>
<td> </td>
@@ -336,7 +336,7 @@
<td>You need to list <b>all</b>
copyright information with all licenses in the copyright file itself. That one has
to be the single point of information. Only files you find in /usr/share/common-licenses
- have a special exception here, everthing else needs to be fully included!</td>
+ have a special exception here, everything else needs to be fully included!</td>
<td>Revised Dec 2008</td>
</tr>
@@ -445,7 +445,7 @@
to chose "or any later" version. If it does not and you have a
licensing that does not give you that option you have to use the
versioned file (L)GPL-2 or -3.</td>
- <td>Januar 2008</td>
+ <td>January 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
@@ -456,7 +456,7 @@
<i>symbols-file-contains-current-version-with-debian-revision</i>
and <i>symbols-file-contains-debian-revision</i>.
</td>
- <td>Januar 2008</td>
+ <td>January 2008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Source missing</td>
--
1.7.2.5
Reply to: