[dak/master] criteria
fixed html errors. made dsa paragraph more weasel compatible :)
Signed-off-by: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@debian.org>
---
web/archive-criteria.html | 14 +++++++++++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/web/archive-criteria.html b/web/archive-criteria.html
index 4f99ad0..79bc642 100644
--- a/web/archive-criteria.html
+++ b/web/archive-criteria.html
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
<ul>
<li>A newly included architecture has to be completely built using
packages available in plain Debian sources. External patches cannot
- be used.<li>
+ be used.</li>
<li>At the time of inclusion a minimal set of binary packages will be
imported into the archive, just enough to get build-essential ready to
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
<li>There must be at least two machines ready to be maintained
by the Debian System Administrators, so at the start of its
- lifetime there will be at least one buildd and one porter machine.</br />
+ lifetime there will be at least one buildd and one porter machine.<br />
The inclusion into the archive will almost certainly happen before
the machines are handed over to DSA, but this should happen as
@@ -110,7 +110,15 @@
(Note that this is the minimum to get into the archive. The release team
may have additional requirements to allow the architecture to release, so
- there would normally need to be more machines, especially more buildds.)
+ there would normally need to be more machines, especially more
+ buildds.)<br />
+
+ <b>Note:</b> The machines, their setup and hosting etc should be
+ coordinated with DSA and needs to be acceptable to DSA. Please
+ <a href="mailto:debian-admin@lists.debian.org";>coordinate with
+ them</a>, they might be able to help you in more ways
+ you can imagine, but at least they can help to avoid useless work
+ if a hosting wouldnt be acceptable. :)
</li>
</ul>
--
1.5.6.5
Reply to: