Re: Status of the CDD Toolkit
- To: Custom Debian Distributions <debian-custom@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Status of the CDD Toolkit
- From: Ben Armstrong <synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 08:31:31 -0400
- Message-id: <1141216292.10872.4.camel@sanctuary.edennet>
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602281415090.29402@wr-linux02>
- References: <20060228123717.GA3335@uv.es> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0602281415090.29402@wr-linux02>
On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 14:22 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> While Debian-Jr decided to set the focus on DebTags I think having
> something that supports metapackages is still important. IMHO
> DebTags might have great advantages over metapackages I think we
> should do this *in adition* and not as a replacement. Thus having
> stable methods to build metapackages is important, IMHO.
Debtags only addresses a fraction of the needs of CDDs. I'd be
interested in seeing CDDT take debtags into account alongside
metapackages.
Ben
Reply to: