Re: Legal question to a file from Dr. Dobb's
On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:59:48 +0200, Lionel wrote in message
<[🔎] 20160606145948.GA4623@capsaicin.mamane.lu>:
> On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 07:13:41PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Paul Wise dijo [Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 01:59:03PM +0800]:
> > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:10 AM, Jan Luca Naumann wrote:
> > >
> > > > The best thing should be to ask the upstream author to replace
> > > > the file, shouldn't it?
> > >
> > > The other option is to contact the author of the Dr. Dobb's
> > > article, whose email address is at the end of the article:
> > >
> > > http://www.drdobbs.com/cpp/logging-in-c/201804215?pgno=4
> >
> > IDs that follow formats similar to dates should be avoided and
> > banned. I scratched my head with curiosity as to how an article from
> > April 2018 was being refered... Not only that — It seems that in the
> > next few years we will get a calendar reform so that April has at
> > least 215 days.
>
> Nah, that's the fifth article on 21 April 2018 :)
..easy now, you forget Donald J. Trump...
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: