Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
- To: Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de>
- Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
- From: Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@gwolf.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:18:31 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20141023171830.GF111419@gwolf.org>
- In-reply-to: <20141021031010.GD4987@smurf.noris.de>
- References: <20141018102118.GA2021@misc-debomatic1> <20141020181458.GA20641@kitenet.net> <11496916.5mCyfBQSlK@gyllingar> <20141020193329.GA5490@roeckx.be> <20141020200349.GA31045@kitenet.net> <20141021031010.GD4987@smurf.noris.de>
Matthias Urlichs dijo [Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 05:10:10AM +0200]:
> > Well, at least I've found yet another reason to perfer to not vote on
> > this GR: It's too darn complicated to understand the procedural hacking
> > that's going on.
> >
> Well, vote them below FD then.
>
> Except for the nice two-paragraph "we don't need no stinkin' GR" amendment
> that's going to be one of the options, of course ;-)
Maybe, *maybe* if Further Discussion does not win this GR, we can
finally stop discussing systemd's evil plan for world domination?
Maybe we should introduce an option called "NO further discussion"?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: