On Tuesday, December 25, 2012 08:25:37 Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Mistikos Nik dijo [Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 10:50:57PM +1000]:
> > Debian documentation is a joke. It constantly refers to Debian
> > versions by their nick names, and not their versions.
> Right, more or less like the Windows documentation authors, where it's
> clear that 3.11 < 95 < 98 < ME < XP < Vista < 7 < 8. Or of the MacOS
> documentation authors, where everybody knows the respective positions
> of the Pumas, Tigers, Cheetas, Panthers and other such animals. Or of
> the Ubuntu Double-Daring Synchronized Snakes.
Oooh, don't forget 2000 and NT. (I'm not sure you can put those in a linear