Re: A common configuration format, anyone?
Enrico Zini <enrico@enricozini.org> writes:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 01:10:41PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
>
>> On Mittwoch, 14. November 2012, Игорь Пашев wrote:
>> > XML is not human-readable :-)
>> either,
>> you have not seen good XML, or
>> you are not human, or
>> you cannot read.
>
> I assume that you are defining "good XML" as "XML that is human
> readable": am I right? :)
Tautological definition is best definition.
--
"I use RMS as a guide in the same way that a boat captain would use
a lighthouse. It's good to know where it is, but you generally
don't want to find yourself in the same spot." - Tollef Fog Heen
Reply to: