Re: Comments on the constitution?
Steve McIntyre dijo [Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:16:19PM +0100]:
> >Humm… An idea could be:
> >
> >‣ The term is defined to be for one year, with the possibility of one
> > automatic renewal
> >‣ If by (election date + 10 months) the DPL sends a (signed,
> > validated, blah) message, a simple referendum is held: secret vote
> > between a "yes" and a "no" (and... Further discussion? :-} )
> > ‣ If the DPL seeking renewal gets a majority, his term is prolonged to
> > a second year
> > ‣ If the DPL does not get a majority, he can still participate in a
> > regular election
> >‣ This mechanism can only be used once — A DPL wanting to run a third
> > term must win a regular (full) election
>
> /me shudders at the extra complexity, especially how it would be
> worded in the constitution. I'm tempted to say: let's just leave
> things the way they are.
Oh, just wait until we get in DEP(n+1) where we require the
Constitution to be automatically parsable as well.
Reply to: