Fwd: RFS: skanlite
I wonder how pissed off my upstreams will be if I forward link to that
lj entry to them?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
Date: 2009/5/30
Subject: Re: RFS: skanlite
To: debian-mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Kai Wasserbäch
<debian@carbon-project.org> wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "skanlite".
>
> * Package name : skanlite
> Version : 0.3-1
> Upstream Author : Kåre Särs <kare.sars@iki.fi>
> Arseniy Lartsev <receive-spam@yandex.ru>
> * URL : ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/4.2.3/src/extragear/
> * License : GPL2+
> Section : kde
Based on the perfectly completely undeniably objective criteria at the
URL below, your upstream is worthy of several points of FAIL.
http://spot.livejournal.com/308370.html
A breakdown of the points of FAIL:
== Source Control ==
* There is no documentation on how to use it for new users [ +5 points of FAIL ]
== Building From Source ==
* There is no documentation on how to build from source [ +20 points of FAIL ]
== Communication ==
* Your project does not have a website [ +50 points of FAIL]
== Documentation ==
* Your code doesn't have a changelog [+10 points of FAIL]
=== FAIL METER ===
65-90 points of FAIL: Kittens die when your code is downloaded
Please inform them of the ways they could improve their project.
Apologies for this mail, but I just couldn't resist trying out the
FAIL criteria. I chose your RFS because it was the latest one without
a reply. Again, please accept my apologies if you don't consider this
mail the slight bit humorous.
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
With best regards
Dmitrijs Ledkovs (for short Dima),
Ледков Дмитрий Юрьевич
Reply to: