Re: Considerations for lilo removal

To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Considerations for lilo removal
From: eixman@gmx.de (Florian Rehnisch)
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 13:53:14 +0000 (UTC)
Message-id: <[🔎] ggbn8a$m4p$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <1213594309.28127.58.camel@petrie.sacredspiral.co.uk> <200806161057.42858.elendil@planet.nl> <20080616091903.GA14724@glandium.org> <20080618065231.GA21352@orphan.zombinet> <20080618105239.GB16668@cloud.net.au> <slrng5jh0d.3aa.keeling@phreaque.nucleus.com> <485A51BC.60606@bzed.de> <slrng5lus0.3aa.keeling@phreaque.nucleus.com>

o s. keeling <keeling@nucleus.com>:

> Use Fluxbox, and you'll have plenty left for emacs.  I'll never use
> those two again.

All bloat, use larswm or even smaller.

BTW: recently converted a lilo box into a grub one.

 flori

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Considerations for lilo removal
  - From: Martin Bähr <mbaehr@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at>

Prev by Date: Re: Header fields and followup address
Next by Date: Re: Considerations for lilo removal
Previous by thread: Re: Wireless network is not working
Next by thread: Re: Considerations for lilo removal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread