Re: Debian release versioning
- To: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian release versioning
- From: "Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)" <faw@funlabs.org>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:53:37 -0300
- Message-id: <[🔎] 487FDB81.80205@funlabs.org>
- In-reply-to: <20080717130509.GJ31131@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
- References: <20080712160909.GA5644@piper.oerlikon.madduck.net> <20080717130509.GJ31131@csclub.uwaterloo.ca>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 17-07-2008 10:05, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 06:09:09PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
>> So lenny will be Debian 5.0. Many people have questioned this
>> choice, given how we onconsistently went ...-2.0-2.1-2.2-3.0-3.1-4.0
>> in the last decade, but it's the RM's choice and not to be debated.
>
> Looks consistent to me.
>
> 1.0-1.1-1.2-1.3
> 2.0-2.1-2.2
> 3.0-3.1
> 4.0
>
> It does give a problem for 5 since by this pattern there can never be
> another release so actually 5.0 doesn't fit. Oh dear. :)
[...]
That's nice. We can now use it as a pattern. :-)
5.0-5.1
6.0-6.1-6.2
7.0-7.1-7.2-7.3
8.0-8.1-8.2
9.0-9.1
10.0
Kind regards,
- --
Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
"Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkh/24AACgkQCjAO0JDlykZ1tQCglfhLTV8wVGpmZ2AamFmhe/Ii
mZIAoMrBytRmeeIilqxhl9hboN0Il6OS
=vcyH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: