Re: VERIFY YOUR EMAIL ACCOUNT
On Monday, 31 March 2008, s. keeling wrote:
> debiminho debiminho <debiminho@gmail.com>:
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > This can be seen as art.
> >
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > This can be seen as art.<br>
> >
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319--
>
> I see it as a fairly dry, mostly repetitive, waste of an email.
> Looking at this, I've no idea what you're talking about (no supplied
> context), and the most original/unique part of that post was not made
> by you; there's one, lone <br> there that your MUA did for you.
Maybe be the redundancy is the art?
On Monday, 31 March 2008, s. keeling wrote:
> debiminho debiminho <debiminho@gmail.com>:
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > This can be seen as art.
> >
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319
> > Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> > Content-Disposition: inline
> >
> > This can be seen as art.<br>
> >
> > ------=_Part_285_3152971.1206999237319--
>
> I see it as a fairly dry, mostly repetitive, waste of an email.
> Looking at this, I've no idea what you're talking about (no supplied
> context), and the most original/unique part of that post was not made
> by you; there's one, lone <br> there that your MUA did for you.
Maybe be the redundancy is the art?
--
Wesley J. Landaker <wjl@icecavern.net>
Reply to: