Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial
- To: Edward Allcutt <ema29@srcf.ucam.org>
- Cc: debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Looking for co-maintainer for mercurial
- From: Clint Adams <schizo@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 09:17:35 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20080302141735.GA4447@scowler.net>
- In-reply-to: <20080226002021.GC26057@jago.allcutt.me.uk>
- References: <47BC6C04.106@debian.org> <47C19BB2.9000706@free.fr> <47C32C77.40707@jak-linux.org> <udl1w70vivr.fsf@vinegar-pot.mit.edu> <20080226000546.GA2928@www.lobefin.net> <20080226002021.GC26057@jago.allcutt.me.uk>
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 07:20:22PM -0500, Edward Allcutt wrote:
> > cvs is IIRC maintained in svn.
> So that would make hg the only VCS package maintained in a VCS inferior
> to itself? :P
No, he just said that cvs qualifies.
Reply to: