[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: sarge is 4.0
To
:
debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Subject
: Re: sarge is 4.0
From
: Tollef Fog Heen <
tfheen@raw.no
>
Date
: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:37:37 +0200
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
410BBCC1.5090400@raw.no
>
In-reply-to
: <
[🔎]
uuswu0mlm61.fsf@GENUINE-IMITATION-OVALKWIK.MIT.EDU
>
References
: <
[🔎]
200407291738.14532@fortytwo.ch
> <
[🔎]
uuswu0mlm61.fsf@GENUINE-IMITATION-OVALKWIK.MIT.EDU
>
kcr@debian.org wrote:
We should call it Debian 2005, just to keep them guessing.
So we need to have an epoch if we decide to go back to our regular
version numbering?
- tfheen
Reply to:
debian-curiosa@lists.debian.org
Tollef Fog Heen (on-list)
Tollef Fog Heen (off-list)
Follow-Ups
:
Re: sarge is 4.0
From:
Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@debian.org>
References
:
sarge is 4.0
From:
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
Re: sarge is 4.0
From:
kcr@debian.org
Prev by Date:
FWD:
Next by Date:
Re: sarge is 4.0
Previous by thread:
Re: sarge is 4.0
Next by thread:
Re: sarge is 4.0
Index(es):
Date
Thread