[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bored and setting up a 3/4tb array at the office.



In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0304091151350.17495-100000@router.windsormachine.com>, Mike Dresser wrote:

> Here's the Raid5 values:
> 
> Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
>                     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
> Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
> mike             1G 18574  64 20326   6  9319   2 28163  89 94607   8 381.1   0

Is ............................................................... this ^^^^^^^^
the reciprocal (1/x) of random access time?

If yes, is it really possible to get 2.6 ms random access time on 
mechanical hard disks? I've never seen a drive which gives a value 
less then 8 ms in the specifications.

-- 
    Miernik         ________________________ jabber:miernik@jabber.gda.pl
__ ICQ: 4004001 ___/__ tel: +48608233394 __/      mailto:miernik@ctnet.pl
Do not use Paypal. They sometimes shut down accounts and steal users money!
http://www.paypalwarning.com/



Reply to: