[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cliff dump



Hello, all.

I recently installed GNU TeXmacs.  It looked to me to be very useful,
though I haven't written a large paper using it yet, and I don't know
whether it scales up or not.  It seemed better than OOo or uSoft Word,
and faster too.

On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 13:18, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> Hi Hugh!
> 
> You wrote:
> 
> > 	* lyx, didnt really give this one much of a chance, v fustraiting to
> > 	 startwith so i guess there is potential there, didnt really like the
> > 	gui but i tried it because i wanted to try something tex related. 
> 
> Well, I only recently started using lyx.  Although I'm an experienced
> LaTeX user and not everything I used to do in LaTeX is possible in lyx
> yet, I must say that I quite like it.  The interface (xforms) indeed
> sucks, although changing the default preferences helps a lot in that
> respect.  And, even better, the next version will have a qt frontend!
> 
> > so i guess what im looking for is a way to produce documents for
> > printing but using a non-graphical environment. [thats why i mention
> > HTML] All i need to be able to do is basic formatting and inserting
> > graphics [graphs and tables can be generated by other programs]
> > Output to pdf would be good.
> 
> Sounds like vim+LaTeX.
> 
> -- 
> Kind regards,
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+
> | Bas Zoetekouw              | GPG key: 0644fab7                     |
> |----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
> | bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org |              a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-curiosa-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
-- 
Codex Gratia Codici
Bill White                 bill.white@grigggsinst.com
617-566-7461(Home)
617-699-8869(Cell)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: