Alexander Hvostov <alex@aoi.dyndns.org> wrote: > Pine [...] does not put users at the mercy of anyone who can > inflate service and upgrade charges because it didn't cost anything to > begin with. Because only the University of Washington can release new versions of PINE, they can inflate the upgrade charges to whatever they wish. The current cost is not relevant. It even meets your definition of "proprietary," so will you drop this now? Thanks, MJR