Re: Report yourself to the BSA
* Rob Weir (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote :
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 02:08:27PM -0500, Shawn McMahon wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:37:16PM +1100, Rob Weir said:
> > >
> > > Me too. gnupg 1.2.1-2, 1.4.0-5. Does evolution still have that
> > > signature corruption bug?
> > It's not evolution:
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun 05 Jan 2003 02:07:29 PM EST) --]
> > gpg: Signature made Sat 04 Jan 2003 11:37:16 PM EST using DSA key ID 1E73B7CD
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Robert Joseph Weir <email@example.com>"
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
> Crap, that's not good at all. I'm using mutt+exim and I've never had
> anyone complain about bad signtaures. Do you think it's an issue on my
> end or yours?
[-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue 07 Jan 2003 10:11:40 GMT) --]
gpg: Signature made Tue 07 Jan 2003 06:55:04 GMT using DSA key ID 1E73B7CD
gpg: Good signature from "Robert Joseph Weir <firstname.lastname@example.org>"
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: checking at depth 0 signed=51 ot(-/q/n/m/f/u)=0/0/0/0/0/2
gpg: checking at depth 1 signed=27 ot(-/q/n/m/f/u)=51/0/0/0/0/0
gpg: next trustdb check due at 2003-05-31
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
Primary key fingerprint: 408A 71A2 EFA3 A17B 0D0C 569D BD0F 8385 1E73 B7CD
[-- End of PGP output --]
mutt seems pretty happy with your signature;