Re: SPAM!!

[Tony Godshall <togo@of.net>]

[I wrote]
> >If memory serves, debian's maililng list advert policy is to
> >charge for rather than to prohibit.  I hope someone has
> >identified the perpetrator and is sending a bill.

[On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 02:02:36PM -0700, Scott Sawyer wrote:]
> Perhaps if whoever collected it was able to keep a 10% collection fee we 
> might actually get people going after the spammers.

Collection agencies charge 1/3 to 1/2 typically.  Why not
let them keep that much?  And what's to stop the fee from
tripling the fee to cover it?

--
T