Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > I hereby call for votes on the following resolution > > If the project passes (before the release of jessie) by a General > Resolution, a "position statement about issues of the day", on the > subject of init systems, the views expressed in that position > statement entirely replace the substance of any TC resolution (past > or future) on the same topic; the TC hereby adopts any such > position statement as its own decision. > > Such a position statement could, for example, use these words: > > The Project requests (as a position statement under s4.1.5 of the > Constitution) that the TC reconsider, and requests that the TC > would instead decide as follows: Substantially similar language reviewed by the project secretary was already approved by the TC in the ballot just concluded, so I feel this is redundant. I vote FD. Bdale
Attachment:
pgpWYKGhyfHGB.pgp
Description: PGP signature