On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 16:13 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Just because you don’t understand that sentence doesn’t mean you can use > it to justify whatever convoluted position of yours. I wonder who really doesn't understand here... > An operating system is universal if it can be used for all purposes. > An operating system that supports several kernels and init systems, but > all incompletely, letting the user choose between different ways of > failing to boot, is not universal. It is irrelevant to any serious use > case. ... since which king is then,... who decides which way/init system/kernel/etc... is the "right", the universal, for all people? Cheers, Chris.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature