Bug#727708: systemd-shim uploaded to NEW
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > The only alternative I see is for systemd-shim to declare a
> > Replaces: against systemd without a Conflicts,
>
> This would be quite wrong; Replaces is not supposed to be used like
> that (but you apparently know that).
>
> How do the systemd maintainers think this problem should be solved ?
I don't know the specifics of systemd-shim, but dpkg-divert is the usual
answer when you need/want to replace something without the consent of the
other side.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
Discover the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/
Reply to: