Hi Russ, On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:16:04PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Therefore, I think it's important for arguments against using systemd to > somehow engage directly with the questions about functionality. Either > there needs to be an argument that the functionality is not important and > can be done without (which raises questions about how one would build > GNOME in such an environment), or there needs to be some sort of plan for > how equivalent functionality to systemd will be provided. I agree; and the plan from the Upstart side is to ensure that equivalent functionality remains available, but it's premature to try to flesh this plan out in any detail while the interfaces themselves are not yet finalized. For the TC decision, what kind of information are you looking for about the plans, beyond "the Ubuntu developers expect to need to address this before upgrading from systemd logind 204 and will hold at 204 until a correct solution is known"? -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer http://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature