[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge



jgg@wakko.debian.net writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"):
> I don't think the ctte should be recommending how to vote. [...]

Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"):
> 	I agree with the first part of this. [...]
> 	I strongly feel we should not be in the position of advising
>  people how to vote.  [etc]

Well, thanks people, but it seems that we probably don't have enough
consensus to issue anything really concrete.  And we're rather late
now anyway.

But, Manoj, thanks a lot for agreeing with this:

> >   * Of the General Resolution currently being voted on, the effects
> >     as we see them on the Sarge release process are as follows:
> >       B,D,E: Sarge will go ahead (software quality permitting).  C:
> >       Sarge will be delayed to remove certain non-free items not
> >          covered by the grandfather clause (see below).
> >       A: Sarge will go ahead if it can be done by 2004-09-01.  F:
> >       Sarge will be delayed to remove the non-free `non-software'.
> 
> 	OK so far.

(Although your MUA seems to have mangled it slightly.)

Ian.



Reply to: