Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge
jgg@wakko.debian.net writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"):
> I don't think the ctte should be recommending how to vote. [...]
Manoj Srivastava writes ("Re: Social Contract GR's Affect on sarge"):
> I agree with the first part of this. [...]
> I strongly feel we should not be in the position of advising
> people how to vote. [etc]
Well, thanks people, but it seems that we probably don't have enough
consensus to issue anything really concrete. And we're rather late
now anyway.
But, Manoj, thanks a lot for agreeing with this:
> > * Of the General Resolution currently being voted on, the effects
> > as we see them on the Sarge release process are as follows:
> > B,D,E: Sarge will go ahead (software quality permitting). C:
> > Sarge will be delayed to remove certain non-free items not
> > covered by the grandfather clause (see below).
> > A: Sarge will go ahead if it can be done by 2004-09-01. F:
> > Sarge will be delayed to remove the non-free `non-software'.
>
> OK so far.
(Although your MUA seems to have mangled it slightly.)
Ian.
Reply to: