Re: [ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 03:36:08PM -0500, david nicol wrote:
> I've had perfectly acceptable results with a c/r system that
> whitelists peer network addresses.
That kind of acceptability depends on context, and can change over time.
> We could demand SPF listing or c/r, until junk all has SPF.
SPF certainly introduces a level of accountability. It likely increases
the cost for all spammers and increases the risk for illegal spammers,
but that's not the same thing as eliminating spam.
Short form: This approach might be good enough, but it might not be.
--
Raul
Reply to: