[ssta@clothcat.org: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]]
----- Forwarded message from Stephen Stafford <ssta@clothcat.org> -----
X-Original-To: listmaster@lists.debian.org
X-From_: ssta@clothcat.org Tue Jun 1 18:04:08 2004
X-Original-To: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Old-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 00:01:12 +0100
From: Stephen Stafford <ssta@clothcat.org>
To: David Nicol <davidnicol@pay2send.com>
Cc: debian-ctte@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: c/r for nonsubscribers Re: Posting on the list [pasc@murphy.debian.org: Re: md5sum <FILE produces spurious ` -' in output]
X-Originating-IP: 80.176.130.243
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p7 (Debian) at linuxops.net
X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list
X-Envelope-To: debian-ctte
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-06-01_01
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on zanclid
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.4 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,IMPRONONCABLE_1,
NO_RDNS2 autolearn=no version=2.63
X-Spam-Level:
Quoting David Nicol <davidnicol@pay2send.com>:
> I have a small challenge-response system that is queried rather than
> being integrated into the system that uses it. This challenge response
> system ("the RAPNAP database") could be integrated into SPF queries
> without too too too much alteration of a DNS tool such as rbldns.
>
> Were the debian project to operate a central c/r database of known-good
> sender return address, peer network address pairs, that would be
> a good thing would it not?
>
> David Nicol
No, absolutely not.
Debian is an open project, it has open mailing lists.
spam is a huge problem, certainly, but given that apart from LKML, which has an
amazing record for spam/ham ratio, Debian lists have the lowest spam in my mail,
it's a problem that's being well handled already.
I've seen figures as high as 85% of email to Debian lists being spam talked
about. No more than 1% of that hits my inbox. That's impressive. Spam mails
fake headers anyway, a c-r system would not stop the spam, it would just make it
harder for people with real reasons to use the lists to post.
I honestly fail to understand why people are so upset that maybe 1% (certainly a
very low proportion, I don't know the exact figure) of the spam that is sent to
the lists gets through the filters. From where I stand that's a stunningly good
record.
Cheers,
--
Stephen Stafford | Development and support consultant
<stephen@clothcat.demon.co.uk> | http://www.clothcat.org
<ssta@clothcat.org> | Never put off until tomorrow what you can
<bagpuss@debian.org> | con someone into doing for you today
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
----- End forwarded message -----
Reply to: