On Fri, 2004-06-18 at 01:07 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Pretty much all of these lead me to conclude that we should resolve > along the following lines: > > * We request that dpkg should be changed to use `amd64'. > Should the dpkg maintainers decline, we will seek clarification of > the Constitution and consider using our powers in 6.1(1), 6.1(2) or > 6.1(4) to overrule the dpkg maintainers. > Restored that patch, thanks for you time. Scott -- Have you ever, ever felt like this? Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part