Re: `debian-ctte@d.o' etc. blackhole
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Ian Jackson wrote:
Well, I'll deal with some of these, since I can. Some I cannot, at least
not right now:
> 6. We insist that debian-ctte@d.o should be an alias for
> debian-ctte@lists.d.o.
Ok, I just did that.
> 7. We insist that tech-ctte@lists.d.o should either bounce or be an
> alias for debian-ctte@lists.d.o.
Hmm, someone else will have to do that. I'm not willing to fiddle with
murphy since I have not studied the new setup.
Are you sure this is true? I didn't find any mention of a tech-ctte@lists
address after a few mins of random grepping, so this might be a general
black hole for all unmatched lists addresses.
> 10. Our Chairman has made informal requests, including mails to
> debian-admin@lists.d.o to correct this problem, and engaged in
Must have just got forgotten.. Not sure, I can't read -admin these days,
it gets too much spam.
> 16. Mail for all unknown local parts @d.o is currently accepted.
> 17. Accepting mail for unknown local parts is usually harmful, and
> rejecting it at RCPT TO is beneficial both for the local system
> and to assist other systems which do SMTP verification callouts.
You found this is all untrue right? The relays will do this, but AFICT the
primary should not.
Jason
Reply to: