Re: `debian-ctte@d.o' etc. blackhole

[Ian Jackson <ian@davenant.greenend.org.uk>]

Ian Jackson writes ("`debian-ctte@d.o' etc. blackhole"):
> I hereby propose the following resolution:

Oh, two of my test messages were delayed, and I have discovered that
some of my assertions in my previous draft were false:

>   4. Messages to debian-ctte@d.o, tech-ctte@d.o, debian-ctte-chair@d.o
>      and tech-ctte-chair@d.o are currently filed in an unread mailbox.

tech-ctte@d.o bounces (correctly).

>  FURTHERMORE, WE NOTE THAT
> 
>  16. Mail for all unknown local parts @d.o is currently accepted.

And nonexistent-local-part@d.o bounces too, so we don't need 16-18
either.

Ian.