[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Proposal for making Multi-Arch:same binNMU-safe



Hi Wookey,

* Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> [2026-04-15 19:59]:
Which Ian are we talking about here (or is there a backup package in debian called 'Ian's backup system')?
Does this issue affect more people than 'Ian'?

Why does it break when binNMUs are built to (internally) match the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH?

Should a backup system not be able to cope with new files that have
old dates in them (are the timestamps of the debs themselves set to
the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH?)

Essentially I am wondering if perhaps this backup system should be
fixed, rather than the build systems changed?

Perhaps this has all been discussed already somewhere, and there is a
good reason why this option has not been included in the solution-set?
If so, do you have a pointer?

See: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843773

Cheers Jochen

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: