Quoting Helmut Grohne (2026-04-15 11:49:42) > From here we leave the wanna-build source code and continue in sbuild. It > already has --binNMU-timestamp and all that the buildd code would have to do > here is check for the newly added field and pass it along using the new > option. When the field is not provided, the option is skipped. Thus, this > change would also be backwards compatible. > > [snip] > > sbuild team: > * Would you be ok with the projected changes? I do not see what change in sbuild would be required. As you pointed out, you can already pass it the timestamp. What else would be needed? There is also --binNMU-changelog which can be passed to completely control the changelog entry without sbuild messing up anything. We talked about this topic in the context of https://bugs.debian.org/843773 which also triggered the addition to --binNMU-changelog in sbuild. Thanks! cheers, josch
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature