Bug#939452: marked as done (sbcl: Please don't list white-list architectures in debian/control)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:21:33 +0000
with message-id <E1i99rh-000B3p-Hu@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#939452: fixed in sbcl 2:1.5.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #939452,
regarding sbcl: Please don't list white-list architectures in debian/control
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
939452: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=939452
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sbcl
Version: 2:1.5.6-1
Severity: normal
Hi!
Looking at the buildd results [1] and comparing with the actual sbcl source [2],
it seems that sbcl supports more architectures than are currently enabled,
including alpha, hppa, ppc64 and riscv. sparc is probably not usable because
Debian has sparc64 and not sparc but porting the sparc backend to sparc64
might be feasible.
In order to support more architectures, we would need to bootstrap them. I haven't
specifically looked into sbcl yet how that works, but I assume you need to cross-
compile or use ecl for bootstrapping. I will look into this later.
As the first step, the architecture white-list in debian/control for the sbcl
package should be removed as the build is blocked by the missing bootstrapped
sbcl package on the buildds anyway.
Thanks,
Adrian
> [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=sbcl&suite=unstable
> [2] https://salsa.debian.org/common-lisp-team/sbcl/tree/master/src/assembly
--
.''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' : Debian Developer - glaubitz@debian.org
`. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de
`- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: sbcl
Source-Version: 2:1.5.6-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
sbcl, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 939452@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org> (supplier of updated sbcl package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:38:38 +0200
Source: sbcl
Architecture: source
Version: 2:1.5.6-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Common Lisp Team <debian-common-lisp@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sébastien Villemot <sebastien@debian.org>
Closes: 939452 939541 939807
Changes:
sbcl (2:1.5.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Replace texlive-generic-recommended by texlive-plain-generic in
Build-Depends (Closes: #939807)
* Make sbcl arch:any (Closes: #939452)
* alpha.patch: new patch, fixes an issue on alpha (Closes: #939541)
Checksums-Sha1:
f6799942e47ff57e4242c755e87a4fe0f42b86a8 2230 sbcl_1.5.6-2.dsc
a46418125b0df3376c2bfdc17e6fb2a0162389f1 73764 sbcl_1.5.6-2.debian.tar.xz
abf29cdf484d532c56953edafa799e018594316f 10285 sbcl_1.5.6-2_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
96088ecd3e73c999e250d175fa46d3ee93c6700e5b9fc1eb214a396373f35508 2230 sbcl_1.5.6-2.dsc
e7c08e86a0e2146f55c89a109eec32372278974668f8d47b02107e3a4d26972e 73764 sbcl_1.5.6-2.debian.tar.xz
fb0d51960304cb5008fe054fa133991ccfb5d9a23c4636a6cdf4684d5467d072 10285 sbcl_1.5.6-2_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
f68bbfdcb6a55747ecf29c8d3e7bfb02 2230 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.6-2.dsc
60f8166b5282e99115c110de1e5cb275 73764 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.6-2.debian.tar.xz
c23538fc1380227206f82143ec805c76 10285 lisp optional sbcl_1.5.6-2_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=GHor
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: